Operative Techniques and Preferences in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Filipino Surgeons

Angelo Rafael O. Mendoza, Carmelo L. Braganza

Oct 2025 DOI 10.35460/2546-1621.2025-0019     Access   

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a crucial procedure for restoring knee stability and functionality, especially in active individuals. While various surgical techniques and graft options are available, preferences among surgeons vary based on regional factors, patient demographics and institutional resources. This study aimed to explore the current practices and preferences of Filipino orthopedic surgeons in ACL reconstruction.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among fellowship-trained Filipino orthopedic surgeons. Data were collected via structured questionnaires focusing on demographics, preoperative protocols, surgical techniques, graft selection and postoperative practices. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were used to summarize and identify trends.

Results: A total of 68 surgeons participated in the study. The majority (91.2%) preferred hamstring tendon grafts and single-bundle reconstruction techniques. Most respondents opted for anteromedial portal femoral tunnel creation and button fixation for the femoral tunnel, while interference screws were commonly used for tibial tunnel fixation. Immediate weight-bearing post-surgery was allowed by 94.1% of respondents, with varying timelines for returning to sports activities. Younger surgeons were more likely to adopt augmentation techniques and clear patients for earlier return to activity.

Conclusion: The study highlights prevailing trends in ACL reconstruction practices among Filipino orthopedic surgeons, emphasizing the preference for hamstring grafts and single-bundle techniques. Regional limitations, such as the unavailability of allografts, significantly influence these choices. These findings underscore the need for localized guidelines and further research to standardize care and optimize patient outcomes.

  1. Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Peng S, Li Q. A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee [Internet]. 2015;22(2):100–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.014
  2. Das U, Patra G, Das B, Pradhan S. Double-versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery: A prospective study with >1 year follow-up. Cureus [Internet]. 2023;15(8):e42829. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42829
  3. Sherman SL, Calcei J, Ray T, Magnussen RA, Musahl V, Kaeding CC, et al. ACL Study Group presents the global trends in ACL reconstruction: biennial survey of the ACL Study Group. J ISAKOS [Internet]. 2021;6(6):322–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2020-000567
  4. Tang H, Xiao Y-F, Liu W-J, Meng J-H, Wu Y-M, Xiong Y-L, et al. Preferences in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey among orthopedic surgeons in China. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. 2024;103(7):e36482. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036482
  5. Tuca M, Valderrama I, Eriksson K, Tapasvi S. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament surgery: A worldwide benchmark study. J ISAKOS. 2022;8(1):2–10.
  6. Alomari MS, Ghaddaf AA, Abdulhamid AS, Alshehri MS, Ashraf M, Alharbi HH. Single bundle versus double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Orthop [Internet]. 2022;56(10):1669–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00718-0
  7. Beckers L, Vivacqua T, Firth AD, Getgood AMJ. Clinical outcomes of contemporary lateral augmentation techniques in primary ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Exp Orthop [Internet]. 2021;8(1):59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00368-5
  8. Waldron K, Brown M, Calderon A, Feldman M. Anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation and return to sport: How fast is too fast? Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2022;4(1):e175–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.027
  9. Alomari MS, Ghaddaf AA, Abdulhamid AS, Alshehri MS, Ashraf M, Alharbi HH. Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Orthop. 2022;56(10):1669–84.
  10. Mistry H, Metcalfe A, Colquitt J, Loveman E, Smith NA, Royle P, et al. Autograft or allograft for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: a health economics perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2019;27(6):1782–90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05436-z
  11. Glattke KE, Tummala SV, Goldberg B, Menzer H, Chhabra A. There is substantial variation in rehabilitation protocols following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey of 46 American orthopaedic surgeons. Arthroscopy [Internet]. 2023;39(3):578-589.e20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.07.024
  12. Greenberg EM, Greenberg ET, Albaugh J, Storey E, Ganley TJ. Rehabilitation practice patterns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey of physical therapists. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther [Internet]. 2018;48(10):801–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2018.8264

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.