The Prevalence of Compassion Fatigue and Compassion Satisfaction Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident Physicians in Selected Hospitals in Manila

Gio Miguel D. Manipula, Mila Zenie P. Maralit, Mitzi I. Mariano, Bianca Isabel D. Martin, Marlon Oliver A. Martin, Eva Irene Yu–Maglonzo, Ma. Therese B. Mallen

Dec 2025 DOI 10.35460/2546-1621.2025-0200     Access   

Abstract

Background: There has been little research done on the prevalence of compassion fatigue (CF) among obstetricians–gynecologists (OBGYNs), despite research suggesting that traumatic childbirth experiences can negatively impact physicians’ well-being and consequently, patient care.

Objectives: This study aims to determine the prevalence of CF and compassion satisfaction (CS) among OBGYN resident physicians in selected hospitals in Manila and identify the associated contributory factors.

Materials and Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted among 105 OBGYN residents using the Professional Quality of Life Scale Version 5 (ProQOL 5), which measures CS and CF—further divided into burnout (BO) and secondary traumatic stress (STS). Data were collected through an online survey and analyzed using Jamovi software. Descriptive statistics were reported as frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals. Associations between variables were determined using independent t-tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with a significance level set at p<0.05.

Results:Most residents scored moderate levels in CS (68.6%), BO (72.4%) and STS (73.3%). Significant associations were found between all three subscales and most work-related factors such as hours of sleep per day, working hours per week and frequency of being called in during off-duty hours. Marital status and parity were also significantly associated with higher BO and STS scores.

Conclusion:The study highlights the presence of CF among OBGYN residents with reported associations with work and personal factors. These findings emphasize the need for institutional interventions to support the well-being of resident physicians, especially in demanding clinical environments.

Keywords: Compassion fatigue, Compassion satisfaction, Obstetrics and Gynecology residents

  1. Bride BE, Radey M, Figley CR. Measuring compassion fatigue. Clin Soc Work J [Internet]. 2007;35(3):155–63. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10615-007-0091-7
  2. Cocker F, Joss N. Compassion fatigue among healthcare, emergency and community service workers: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2016;13(6):618. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13060618
  3. Bhutani J, Bhutani S, Balhara YPS, Kalra S. Compassion fatigue and burnout amongst clinicians: a medical exploratory study. Indian J Psychol Med [Internet]. 2012;34(4):332–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.108206. PMID: 23723540; PMCID: PMC3662129.
  4. Lee HJ, Lee M, Jang SJ. Compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout among nurses working in trauma centers: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021;18(14):7228. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147228
  5. Alston MJ, Metz TD, Fothergill R, Meg Autry A, Wagner SA, Allshouse AA, et al. Factors influencing residency program selection by medical students pursuing obstetrics and gynecology. J Grad Med Educ [Internet]. 2017;9(1):123–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00148.1. PMID: 28261407; PMCID: PMC5319611.
  6. Dirik D, Sak R, Şahin-Sak İT. Compassion fatigue among obstetricians and gynecologists. Curr Psychol [Internet]. 2021;40(9):4247–54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02022-w
  7. Ang AAC, Soriano-Estrella AL. Burnout, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians in the Philippines: A cross-sectional study. Philipp J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2021;45(1):1–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/pjog.pjog_1_21
  8. Kruper A, Domeyer-Klenske A, Treat R, Pilarski A, Kaljo K. Secondary traumatic stress in ob-gyn: A mixed methods analysis assessing physician impact and needs. J Surg Educ [Internet]. 2021;78(3):1024–34. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.08.038
  9. Ondrejková N, Halamová J. Qualitative analysis of compassion fatigue and coping strategies among nurses. Int J Nurs Sci [Internet]. 2022;9(4):467–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.09.007
  10. Allen R, Watt F, Jansen B, Coghlan E, Nathan EA. Minimising compassion fatigue in obstetrics/gynaecology doctors: exploring an intervention for an occupational hazard. Australas Psychiatry [Internet]. 2017;25(4):403–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1039856217700776
  11. Stamm BH (2010). The Concise ProQOL Manual, 2nd Ed. Pocatello, ID: ProQOL.org
  12. Winkel AF, Morgan HK, Hammoud MM, Schatzman-Bone S, Young OM, Santen S, et al. Burnout and well-being in trainees: Findings from a national survey of US obstetrics and gynecology residents. J Grad Med Educ [Internet]. 2024;16(5):572–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00554.1
  13. Wang J, Su M, Chang W, Hu Y, Ma Y, Tang P, et al. Factors associated with compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction in obstetrics and gynaecology nurses: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open [Internet]. 2023;10(8):5509–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1790 
  14. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: Contributors, consequences, and solutions. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2018;283(6):516–29.
  15. Al-Ma’mari NO, Naimi AI, Tulandi T. Prevalence and predictors of burnout among obstetrics and gynecology residents in Canada. Gynecol Surg [Internet]. 2016;13(4):323–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10397-016-0955-3

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.