Cognitive Impairment Among HIV-positive Individuals in a Tertiary Infectious Disease Hospital in the Philippines

Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a global concern causing a wide array of medical complications, which could affect the morbidity and mortality of the illness.

Despite advances in the treatment of HIV, the central nervous system (CNS) is still often affected by this disease. Impairment of cognition caused by HIV disease is known as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). Importantly, compared with unaffected populations, HAND, even in its mild form, is associated with lower medication adherence, less ability to perform the most complex daily tasks, worse quality of life, difficulty obtaining employment, and shorter survival.[1]

Disruption of neurocognitive functioning is one of the most frequent complications in patients infected with HIV. It is estimated that 30% to 60% of HIV-positive individuals are affected.[2]

HAND manifests as subcortical dementia characterized by psychomotor slowing, changes in mood and anxiety levels and deficits in memory, abstraction, information processing, verbal fluency, decision-making, and attention.[3-5]

From 1984 to 2015, there were 25,684 HIV Ab sero-positive cases reported in the Philippines. In May 2015, there were 748 new HIV Ab sero-positive individuals confirmed by the STD/AIDS Cooperative Central Laboratory (SACCL).[6]

Here in the Philippines, to our knowledge there were no reports yet on the prevalence of cognitive impairment among HIV patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of neurocognitive impairment among HIV-positive individuals in the Philippines. Specifically, we would like to (1) Classify them as non-cognitively impaired, cognitively impaired, and dementia, (2) Determine the baseline demographics, education level, CD4 count, presence of family support, and (3) Assess the neuropsychiatric symptoms of our patients.

 

Methodology

This was a cross-sectional study done at the outpatient department of a tertiary infectious disease hospital located in Manila, Philippines conducted from May 2015 to July 2015 and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center and San Lazaro Hospital. The following patients were included in the study: (1) patients with positive HIV status, (2) age 18 years old and above, (3) ability to comprehend study procedures, and able to provide informed consent. Patients with a diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia) and severely handicapped patients (loss of dominant hand, bilateral blindness, deafness) were excluded from the study.

Demographic data was obtained using structured interviews. The following data was collected: medical and psychiatric history, marital status; education, smoking, alcohol and illicit drug use, history of hypertension and diabetes, current medications, recent CD4 counts, and family support. Several tests were used to assess cognitive impairment, functional disability, and neuropsychiatric symptoms in all participants and are described in Table 1.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment – Filipino (MoCA-P) was used to differentiate non-cognitively impaired and cognitively impaired participants. The MoCA provides some coverage of executive function, motor skill, language fluency, and verbal learning. Barthel index and Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale was used to determine functional disability. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed using the neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). The NPI has been used to characterize neuropsychiatric symptom profiles in a variety of neurological diseases.[7]

Table 1. List of Neurocognitive and neuropsychologic tools applied in the present HIV study

Tools

Key features

Number of items

Time required

Maximum score

Cut off

Sensitivity and specificity/ reliability 

Montreal cognitive assessment

(MOCA)[8] 

Cognitive screening tool for detection of MCI

in primary care

Addresses frontal/executive functioning

12 items

10 minutes

30 

26 and above normal

Sensitivity of 90%

for MCI

100% for mild dementia

Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale[9] 

most useful for identifying how a person is functioning at the present time and for identifying improvement or deterioration over time. 

8 items

5-15 minutes

 

 

Inter-rater reliability was established at 0.85

 

 

Barthel index 

measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL)

10 items 

2-3 minutes 

20

lower scores indicating

increased disability

high inter-rater reliability (0.95) and test–retest reliability (0.89)

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)[10] 

Assess dementia-related behavioral symptoms which they felt other measures did not sufficiently address. 

12 symptoms/questions

5 minutes

frequency of the symptoms: 4-point scale, 

 3-point scale, distress:  5-point scale

 

Inter-rater reliability ranged from 93.6% to 100%

 

 

 

Data Processing and Statistical analysis

Data were described using means and standard deviations, frequency counts and percentages. For bivariate analysis, t-test was used to analyze the difference between means of two groups, and one-way ANOVA for three or more groups. Fischer’s exact test was used to determine the difference in frequencies between groups. Multivariate analysis was also done using binary logistic regression to determine independent factors of the outcome variable (cognitive impairment). For all tests, a 95% confidence level was considered significant (p<0.05). SPSS ver 19 was used as the statistical software. Accuracy parameters were determined using standard formulae.

 

Results

We initially examined 112 HIV positive patients. The mean age of patients was 31.4 years and there was a preponderance of males. The mean year of formal education was 13.8 years. Majority of the patients were single, all with a history of alcohol intake, and majority were also smokers. Only one patient was found to have hypertension and no patient had diabetes. Mean duration of HIV was 24.4 months, mean duration of intake of medicines was 13.4 months, and mean CD4 count was 224.

The parameter used was MoCA–P, using the score of 26 as cut-off, majority (56.7%) of them were noted to have cognitive impairment. All of our patients are independent in both basic and independent activities of daily living, hence none of them met the criteria for dementia. There was no sociodemographic and lifestyle variable that was significantly associated with presence/absence of cognitive impairment, as determined by MoCA–P. Duration of HIV, duration of intake of medicine and CD4 count, on the other hand, were significantly associated with cognitive impairment (see Table 2). Scores of those with impairment were significantly lower than in those without impairment for all components of MoCA, except for the “naming” and” orientation” domains, where the two groups achieved similar (high) scores (see Table 3).

 

Table 2. Comparison of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of HIV patients with and without cognitive impairment as determined by MOCA-P (Bivariate analysis).

 

All

Without Impairment

N=48

With Impairment

N=63

P value*

Sociodemographic

 

 

 

 

Age in years, mean +/SD

31.4+/5.6

31.3 +/5.7

31.4 +/5.6

0.849

Sex

 

 

 

0.419

Male

105

44

51

 

Female

6

4

2

 

Years of formal education, mean +/SD

13.8+/2.2

13.5+/1.2

13.6+/0.84

0.305

Civil Status

 

 

 

0.619

Single

107

47

60

 

Married

4

1

3

 

Lifestyle

 

 

 

 

Smoking

 

 

 

0.242

Yes

98

44

54

 

No

13

4

9

 

Alcoholic

 

 

 

 

Yes

111

48

63

1.00

No

0

0

0

 

Clinical

 

 

 

 

+ HPN

0

0

0

1.00

+DM

0

0

0

1.00

Duration of HIV in months, mean +/SD

24.4+/26.5

31.4+/27.5

19.1 +/24.5

0.014

CD4 count, mean +/SD

 

<200

224.1+/185.6

397.1+/141.3

 

0

92.3+/71.7

 

61

<0.0001

 

<0.0001

Duration of med intake, in months, mean +/SD

13.4+/21.8

18.2+/25.5

9.5+/17.7

0.038

Type of meds taken

 

 

 

0.999

AZT

82

36

46

 

TDF

7

3

4

 

None

22

9

13

 

*T-test for independent samples for continuous variables and 2x2 Fischer’s exact test for discrete variables.

 

Table 3. Components of MoCA-P, by presence/absence of cognitive impairment in the present HIV study.

 

Without Impairment

N=48

With impairment

N=63

P value
Executive (H=5, L=0) 4.9 +/0.24 4.30 +/0.91 <0.0001
Naming (H=3, L=0) 3 +/0 3+/0 1.00
Attention (H=6, L=0) 5.6 +/0.6 4.2+/0.74 <0.0001
Language (H=3, L=0) 2.0+/0.4 1.4+/0.6 <0.0001
Abstract (H=2, L=0) 1.6+/0.5 0.94+/0.6 <0.0001
Delayed Memory (H=5, L= 3.7+/0.6 1.9+/0.7 <0.0001
Orientation (H=6, L=0) 6.0+/0 6.0+/0 1.00

 

All variables with p-value of <=0.500 were entered into a logistic regression model to determine the independent factors of cognitive impairment (see Table 4). The variables included were sex, years of formal education, history of smoking, HIV duration, CD4 count, and duration of medication intake. Results showed that only CD4 count was significantly associated with cognitive impairment (p=0.0001, O.R. 0.96). Since the coefficient was negative, it indicated an inverse relationship wherein lower CD4 counts, specifically less than 224 (average of the data set), were associated with the presence of cognitive impairment. Odds ratio was 0.96 which meant patients with cognitive impairment were 96% less likely to have CD4 counts >224 compared to those without cognitive impairment.

Table 4. Results of logistic regression with cognitive impairment as an outcome variable in the present HIV study (MoCA-P)

Variable

Coeff.

StdErr

P value

O.R.

Low --

High

Sex

-1.4231

2.8547

0.6181

0.2410

0.0009

64.8495

education

0.7134

0.4579

0.1192

2.0410

0.8319

5.0072

smoker

-0.6850

1.4199

0.6295

0.5041

0.0312

8.1495

duration

-0.0251

0.0240

0.2944

0.9752

0.9304

1.0221

CD4

-0.0395

0.0099

0.0001

0.9612

0.9428

0.9800

duration of medications

0.0416

0.0364

0.2536

1.0425

0.9706

1.1196

Intercept

0.7794

6.3532

0.9024

 

 

 

 

Neuropsychiatric inventory scale scores did not show significant association with cognitive impairment (see Table 5). Among those with cognitive impairment, 37 or 58.7% did not have any neuropsychiatric symptoms while 41.3% had. Among those with no cognitive impairment 32/48 or 66.7% showed neuropsychiatric symptoms.

 

Table 5. NPI scores by presence/absence of cognitive impairment in the present HIV study

 

0

N=69

1

N=20

2

N=12

3-4

N=10

P VALUE
MOCA         0.323

(+)CI (<26)

N=63

37 (58.7%) 14 5 7  

(-) MOCA

N=48

32 (66.7%) 6 7 3  

 

 

Discussion

From December 1986 when the first confirmed HIV patient in our country was identified, until now there are more than 25,000 HIV positive individuals. The prevalence of cognitive impairment among HIV positive individuals is not yet been established. We are only dependent on statistics given by other countries. Recent publications estimate the prevalence of HAND exceeds 50%. This was somehow reflected in this pilot study. Sixty-three out of 112 patients (57%) were cognitively impaired using MoCA-P.

Previous studies, identified older age, low current CD4 count (<200), presence of past HIV-related CNS disease, longer HIV duration, low level of educational achievement, sex (female, as associated with lower socioeconomic status in some countries), neuropsychiatric disorders, eg, major depressive disorder, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, psychosis, bipolar disorder (current or history of), current or history of illicit drug/alcohol abuse/dependence as important risk factors in developing neurocognitive impairment in HIV patients.[11] In this study, only CD4 count was an independent factor associated with cognitive impairment. There was no sociodemographic and lifestyle variable that was significantly associated with the presence/absence of cognitive impairment, as determined by MoCA-P. NPI scores did not show significant association with cognitive impairment.

Reported cases of HIV associated cognitive impairment produced loss of retentive memory, impaired attention, lack of visuospatial memory, difficulty with complex sequencing, and mental slowing.[12,13] Our results showed that scores of those with cognitive impairment were significantly lower than in those without impairment for visuospatial memory, executive functioning, retentive memory, attention, language, and abstraction.

In our study we also tried to group patients based on the current type of anti-retroviral drugs they were taking, since the drug zidovudine was proven to be effective in improving cognitive performance.[14] However, in our results, the type of medication was not associated with presence or absence of cognitive impairment, provided that majority of our patients were taking zidovudine as one of their anti-retroviral medications.

As previously mentioned, cognitive impairment among HIV positive individuals was associated with lower medication adherence, worse quality of life, and shorter survival, hence screening all HIV positive patients, particularly with low CD4 count should be started as a routine in our country, as to what the recent international consensus emphasized. Furthermore, because the CNS is commonly one of the first targets of HIV infection, good practice suggests that a patient’s neurocognitive profile should be assessed early (within 6 months of diagnosis, as soon as clinically appropriate) using a sensitive screening tool.[15] Newer studies show the Montreal Assessment Scale (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), like what we used in this study has an advantage in that it is free and evaluates multiple cognitive domains in one sitting.[16] If possible, screening should take place before the initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy, as this will establish accurate baseline data and allow for subsequent changes to be more accurately assessed. This study has several limitations. The study was conducted in an urban outpatient HIV center which may not be representative of HIV-positive individuals in the community and rural settings. This study did not discuss regarding treatment guidelines on HAND.

Conclusion

More than half or 56.7% of subjects with HIV in this study met the criteria for neurocognitive impairment with the MoCA-P, despite the fact that almost all were treated with anti-retroviral drugs. Cognitive impairment was significantly associated with low CD4 count, with a sensitivity of 100% for a count of <224. More than half or 58.7% of subjects with cognitive impairment did not show any neuropsychiatric symptoms. Our results, while admittedly tentative, and still ongoing, indicate that neurocognitive impairment was likely to be an important component of HIV infection and highlighted the need to further increase awareness regarding this HIV complication.

DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest and no source of funding for this study.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge Dr. Simeon Marasigan for his contribution in the conceptualization and final editing of this study. May he continue to inspire residents and young neurologists to dedicate their life in helping patients with dementia as what he has done throughout his life. To him we dedicate this manuscript.

  1. Mind Exchange Working Group. Assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: a consensus report of the mind exchange program. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013;56(7):1004–17. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis975
  2. Grant I. Neurocognitive disturbances in HIV. Int Rev Psychi­atry [Internet]. 2008;20(1):33–47. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540260701877894
  3. Spudich S, González-Scarano F. HIV-1-related central ner­vous system disease: current issues in pathogenesis, dia­gnosis, and treatment. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med [Internet]. 2012;2(6):a007120. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a007120
  4. González-Scarano F, Martín-García J. The neuropathogene­sis of AIDS. Nat Rev Immunol [Internet]. 2005;5(1):69–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri1527
  5. Portegies P, Enting RH, de Gans J, Algra PR, Derix MM, Lange JM, et al. Presentation and course of AIDS dementia complex: 10 years of follow-up in Amsterdam, The Nether­lands. AIDS. 1993;7(5):669–75.
  6. STD/AIDS Cooperative Central Laboratory (SACCL) Octo­ber 2013.
  7. McArthur JC. HIV dementia: an evolving disease. J Neuroim­munol [Internet]. 2004;157(1–2):3–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.08.042
  8. Galvin JE, Sadowsky CH, NINCDS-ADRDA. Practical guidelines for the recognition and diagnosis of demen­tia. J Am Board Fam Med [Internet]. 2012;25(3):367–82. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.03.100181
  9. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179–86.
  10. Cummings JL. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology [Inter­net]. 1997;48(5 Suppl 6):S10-6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/wnl.48.5_suppl_6.10s
  11. Mind Exchange Working Group. Assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: a consensus report of the mind exchange program. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013;56(7):1004–17. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis975
  12. Neurologic Complications of HIV and Antiretroviral therapy, Duarte et al., the PRN notebook October 200, published in New York City by the Physicians Res Our reach network Inc.
  13. Ropper A, Samuels M, Klein J. Adams and Victor’s Princip­les of Neurology. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2014.
  14. Sidtis JJ, Gatsonis C, Price RW, Singer EJ, Collier AC, Rich­man DD, et al. Zidovudine treatment of the AIDS dementia complex: Results of a placebo-controlled trial. Ann Neu­rol [Internet]. 1993;33(4):343–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.410330403
  15. Valcour V, Paul R, Chiao S, Wendelken LA, Miller B. Scree­ning for cognitive impairment in human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2011;53(8):836–42. Availa­ble from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir524
  16. Watkins C, Treisman G. Cognitive impairment in patients with AIDS – prevalence and severity. HIV AIDS (Auckl) [Internet]. 2015;35. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/hiv.s39665 

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which permits use, share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.